Chop Chop

If you listen very closely, you can actually hear all the Tik Tok relators limbering up and getting ready to dance the day away tomorrow after the BOC cut. Money markets are widely pricing in a 50 bp cut tomorrow, with 76% odds of 50 bp reduction. That is good enough to say the majority of respondents expect Uncle Tiff to chop, chop, chop away at the overnight rate.

But, before we all stretch to join in the dancing, lets take a very brief trip down memory lane. It was only 4 ish weeks ago that we saw this ‘ jumbo sized ‘ cut of 50 bps from Jerome and Co. to the South. And what has happened since? Well, not exactly anything good. In fact, Canada 5 year bond yields ( and by default 5 year mortgage rates ) are actually higher than before Jerome and the Fed decided an emergency 50 bp fire sale cut was needed in the economy. Central banks are loosing some control over the long end of the yield curve right now, and actions that central bankers take are having a reduced impact on the long end of the yield curve. Sure, the 1 and 2 year rates are coming down as expected, but the longer end of the curve remains stubbornly high. This is a problem as a lot of capital investment in a country is based around longer term yields – not the 1 and 2 year bond.

When businesses look to invest in a country, an economy, an area, etc. they generally need to borrow a lot of money to do so, and they certainly don’t want their prospects resting on the whim of a 1 year or 2 year bond. Generally businesses look at 10 years plus. So if bond yields and rates are staying higher on the long end of the curve, this makes it more expensive, and a lot more troublesome for companies to invest. That is just one of the ‘ real world ‘ implications of longer dated bonds yielding more. But lets bring it back to mortgages for a minute.

When short rates are low, and long bonds are high this will give lenders of money a very nice profit margin. Banks and lending institutions generally make their money on the ‘ borrow short – lend long ‘ premise. They borrow their funds from things like savings accounts bank account, short terms government bonds and the like, and then lend those same funds out to things like mortgages, car loans, etc. The lender keeps the difference, or the ‘ spread ‘ between the two. So, lower short term rates will make a boon for lenders. However, this will also lead to a lot of uncertainty in the mortgage market. If borrowers are borrowing on the 1 and 2 year terms due to lower rates, then they are a lot more vulnerable to potential future rate increases sooner. If for some reason the bond market vigilantes come out in full force and drive yields on Canadian bonds up, then the borrower could be faced with a much higher renewal rate in only 12 months time. Not exactly ideal for a market that is already bouncing from problem to problem. These shorter renewal terms could also become a problem if the government keeps meddling and changing the rules on a monthly basis. Someone that qualifies now may not qualify in a year if the rules change. If that borrower was on a 5 year term, they have time to pay down the mortgage, potentially increase their income with a side hustle or second job, or maybe a couple years for the home to appreciate in value and lower the LTV. But there isn’t much a person can do in 10 months to change things.

While tomorrow will likely see a 50 bp rate cut, we must also keep in mind that every time rates have been cut by 50 bps at once, the economy absolutely shits the bed within a few months. Things only ever get worse after a 50 bp rate cut. Never in the history of central banking have things improved right after a 50 bp rate cut. Now, some may argue the Canadian economy has already shit the bed, and is currently in the process of rolling over in it, but that is a moot point. No matter if Uncle Tiff cuts 25, 50, or even 75 bps things will get worse from here before they get better.

On the topic of a 75 bp cut, let’s please also remember that the 2 economists calling for the 75 bps of rate cut on Wednesday happen to be employed by the 2 big banks that seem to have the worst mortgage arrears!!! Gee fucking whiz, how about that? The people that would be saved by lower rates, just happen to be the ones calling for the larger rate cut. Well, colour me surprised. I won’t mention them by name here, but we all know who they are. In finance it is always a rule to believe half of what you see and none of what you hear. Finance, banks in particular have a magical gift for talking their own book. Banks do not give a rats ass about their customer, they only care about saving their own ass, and by default their own bonus.

While GDP keeps missing even the low bar, and unemployment remains high, we also must keep an eye to the inflation numbers. Yes, yes I know, inflation was ONLY 1.6% last month, but 1.6% added on to all the previous years of inflation is really starting to weigh on consumers. The reason inflation is low is that people don’t have any money left to buy anything!!! But, I see a larger problem with inflation going on. I know everyone looks at the headline number, but if you look at the various components in the inflation reading, it gets downright scary. Yes, overall inflation was 1.6%, but I always look at things people HAVE to buy, and things people WANT to buy. If you strip out all of the WANT to buy items, inflation is running one hell of a lot hotter than 1.6%. If your rent or mortgage payment is going up 6% a year, and your food continues to increase 2.5% a year, it doesn’t really matter that the cost of a mediterranean cruise dropped by 9% in the month. The inflation numbers are being used as a massive distraction right now to paper over or cover up that Canadians cannot afford things anymore. Sure, lowering interest rates will help, but lowering interest rates doesn’t really bring down the cost of potatoes and kiwi fruit at the Loblaws. Lowering interest rates doesn’t make the gas in the car cheaper. Now, if we get sustained reductions like we are seeing we may start to get some relief on the mortgage payments and rent prices, but, just like everyone who locked in to a 5 year in 2021 for 1.69% has enjoyed years of low payments, the flip side is that everyone who locked in last year at 5.75% will take 4 more years before lower rates help them. Remember, it takes time to heal things. Without the mortgage servicing costs and rent inflation being as high as they are, Canada is basically on the cusp of deflation. Deflation is not a path you want to cross. Time will tell if we actually tip into a deflationary environment or not, but we certainly have all the right ingredients right now.

Tomorrow will be an interesting day to say the least. I think the reaction to the rate announcement will look a lot like the upcoming US election : Half the population will be happy, and the other 50% of the population will focus on the reason for the larger rate cut. No matter what happens, about half the population won’t agree with the outcome. No matter the outcome though, Uncle Tiff has some fancy footwork to perform over the coming months as he tried to reduce rates, reduce borrowing costs, keep inflation down, keep deflation at bay, keep employment strong, and make sure the housing market doesn’t get overheated with all the rate cuts. I wish him the best of luck, and if can pull it off, it will be some David Copperfield magic level work. In the mean time, Canadians’ finances are left in the balance, and we all wonder what we have to chop, chop, chop from our budgets to be able to afford life.


Posted

in

by

Comments

One response to “Chop Chop”

  1. fgsjr2015 Avatar

    The local Real Canadian Superstore outlet, unlike its Save-On-Foods store competition, has yet again squeezed down what it will honor with regards to price matching as well as the purchase or loyalty points it offers. Since 2023, the points offerings I’d previously received were cut in half: from 200 points per $1 spent (before taxes when it’s applicable), to only 100 per $1 spent. 100 points translate into 10 cents.

    This, while Loblaws, along with other giant grocer corporations, have been raking-in record profits, year after year, while a record number of people have to choose between which necessities of life they can afford. To say it feels unfair is an understatement, but what can I or most other shoppers realistically do about it?

    There still are many Canadians who hold the erroneous notion that they live and buy in a nation with truly competitive and therefore consumer-fair markets. But in reality, big corporations are able to get unaccountably even bigger, defying the very spirit of government oversight rules established to ensure healthy competition by limiting concentrated ownership — especially in regards to corporations selling and profiteering from the necessities of life, notably food. Those rules, however, are largely un-enforced by the government.

    I feel that the heavily corporatized mainstream news-media, which is virtually all of it, has been editorially emasculated thus negligent when it comes to regularly investigating and exposing such societally consequential oversight-rule breaking.

    I see this as a problematically large part of a corpocratic existence fueled by elected officials getting indebted thus beholden to huge corporate entities, particularly due to their generous political monetary donations.

    Meanwhile, way too many people, perhaps an all-time-high percentage, have to choose between which necessities of life they can afford. A very large and growing populace are increasingly too overworked, tired, worried and even rightfully angry about food and housing unaffordability thus insecurity for themselves or their family — largely due to insufficient income — to criticize or boycott Big Business/Industry for the societal damage it needlessly causes/allows, particularly when not immediately observable. And I doubt that this effect is totally accidental, as it greatly benefits the interests of insatiable corporate greed.

    The more that such corporations make, all the more they want — nay, need — to make next quarterly. It’s never enough, yet the news-media will implicitly celebrate their successful greed, a.k.a. ‘stock market gains’.

    At the same time, corporate officers will shrug their shoulders and defensively say their job is to protect shareholders’ bottom-line interests. And, of course, the shareholders also will shrug their shoulders and state they just collect the dividends and that the big bosses are the ones who make the decisions involving ethics or lack thereof.

    It really seems there’s little or no human(e)/moral accountability when the biggest profits are involved, perhaps even inversely proportionally so. Nor can there be a sufficiently guilty conscience if the malpractice is continued, business as usual. ‘We are a capitalist nation, after all,’ the morally lame self-justification may go.

    Still, there must be a point at which corporate greed thus practice will end up hurting big business’s own monetary interests. Or is the unlimited-profit objective/nature somehow irresistible? It brings to mind the allegorical fox stung by the instinct-abiding scorpion while ferrying it across the river, leaving both to drown.

    Like

Leave a reply to fgsjr2015 Cancel reply